PAPELES DEL PSICÓLOGO Vol. 43-1 Enero - Abril 2022

Martínez, A., & Salgado, J. F. (2021). A meta-analysis of the faking resis- tance of forced-choice personality inventories. Frontiers in Psychology , 12 , 732241. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.732241 Morillo, D. (2018). Item response theory models for forced-choice questionnaires . Doctoral dissertation, Universidad Autónoma de, Madrid. Morillo, D., Abad, F. J., Kreitchmann, R. S., Leenen, I., Hontangas, P., & Ponsoda, V. (2019). The journey from Likert to forced-choice questionnaires: Evidence of the invariance of item parameters. Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology , 35 (2), 75-83. https://doi.org/10.5093/jwop2019a11 Morillo, D., Leenen, I., Abad, F. J., Hontangas, P., de la Torre, J., & Ponsoda, V. (2016). A dominance variant under the multi-unidimensional pairwi- se-preference framework: Model formulation and Markov Chain Mon- te Carlo estimation. Applied Psychological Measurement , 40 (7), 500-516 . https://doi.org/10.1177/0146621616662226 Mulder, J., & van der Linden, W. J. (2009). Multidimensional adaptive tes- ting with optimal design criteria for item selection. Psychometrika , 74 (2), 273-296 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-008-9097-5 Nieto, M. D., Abad, F. J., & Hernández-Camacho, A. (2017). Calibrating a new item pool to adaptively assess the Big Five. Psicothema , 29 .3, 390-395 . https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2016.391 Nieto, M. D., Abad, F. J., & Olea, J. (2018). Assessing the Big Five with bi- factor computerized adaptive testing. Psychological Assessment , 30 (12), 1678-1690 . https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000631 Olea, J., Abad, F. J., & Barrada, J. R. (2010). Tests informatizados y otros nuevos tipos de tests. Papeles del psicólogo , 31 (1), 97- 107. Otero, I., Cuadrado, D., & Martínez, A. (2020). Convergent and predictive validity of the Big Five factors assessed with single sti- mulus and cuasi-ipsative questionnaires. Journal of Work and Or- ganizational Psychology , 36 (3), 215-222. https://doi.org/10.5093/jwop2020a17 Pavlov, G., Shi, D., Maydeu-Olivares, A., & Fairchild, A. (2021). Item desirability matching in forced-choice test construction. Per- sonality and Individual Differences , 183 , 111114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.111114 Poropat, A. E. (2009). A meta-analysis of the five-factor model of personality and academic performance. Psychological Bulletin , 135 (2), 322-338. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014996 Reise, S. P., & Henson, J. M. (2000). Computerization and adaptive administration of the NEO PI-R. Assessment , 7 (4), 347-364. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F107319110000700404 Richardson, M., Abraham, C., & Bond, R. (2012). Psychological co- rrelates of university students’ academic performance: A systema- tic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin , 138 (2), 353-387. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026838 Salgado, J.F. (2005). Personalidad y deseabilidad social en contex- tos organizacionales: implicaciones para la práctica de la psico- logía del trabajo y las organizaciones. Papeles del psicólogo , 92 , 115-128. Salgado, J. F. (2016). A theoretical model of psychometric effects of faking on assessment procedures: Empirical findings and implica- tions for personality at work: A Theoretical Model of faking psy- chometric effects. International Journal of Selection and Assessment , 24 (3), 209-228. https://doi.org/10.1111/ij- sa.12142 Salgado, J. F., Anderson, N., & Tauriz, G. (2015). The validity of ip- sative and cuasi-ipsative forced-choice personality inventories for different occupational groups: A comprehensive meta-analysis. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology , 88 (4), 797-834. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12098 Salgado, J. F., & Táuriz, G. (2014). The Five-Factor Model, forced-choice personality inventories and performance: A comprehensive meta-analy- sis of academic and occupational validity studies . European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology , 23 (1), 3-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2012.716198 Sass, R., Frick, S., Reips, U.-D., & Wetzel, E. (2020). Taking the test taker’s perspective: Response process and test motivation in multidimensional forced-choice versus rating scale instruments. Assessment , 27 (3), 572- 584. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191118762049 Stark, S., Chernyshenko, O. S., & Drasgow, F. (2005). An IRT approach to constructing and scoring pairwise preference items involving stimuli on different dimensions: The multi-unidimensional pairwise-preference mo- del. Applied Psychological Measurement , 29 (3), 184-203. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146621604273988 Stark, S., Chernyshenko, O. S., Drasgow, F., Nye, C. D., White, L. A., Heffner, T., & Farmer, W. L. (2014). From ABLE to TAPAS: A new generation of personality tests to support military selection and classification secisions. Military Psychology , 26 (3), 153-164. https://doi.org/10.1037/mil0000044 Trent, J. D., Barron, L. G., Rose, M. R., & Carretta, T. R. (2020). Tailored Adaptive Personality Assessment System (TAPAS) as an indicator for counterproductive work behavior: Comparing validity in applicant, ho- nest, and directed faking conditions. Military Psychology , 32 (1), 51-59. https://doi.org/10.1080/08995605.2019.1652481 Tsutsui, S. (2006). Node histogram vs. edge histogram: A comparison of probabilistic model-building genetic algorithms in permutation domains. 2006 IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation , 1939-1946 . https://doi.org/10.1109/CEC.2006.1688a44 Viswesvaran, C., & Ones, D. S. (1999). Meta-analyses of fakability estimates: Implications for personality measurement . Educational and Psychological Measurement , 59 (2), 197-210. https://doi.org/10.1177/00131649921969802 ABAD, FRANCISCO J.; KREITCHMANN, RODRIGO S.; SORREL, MIGUEL A.; NÁJERA, PABLO; GARCÍA-GARZÓN, EDUARDO; GARRIDO, LUIS EDUARDO Y JIMÉNEZ, MARCOS 35 S e c c i ó n M o n o g r á f i c a